Page 5 of 14 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 199

Thread: RWG Just When you think it can't get any worse

  1. #61
    Zombie Hunter OnlyMeiya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    481
    Rep Power
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Royal Deluxe View Post
    Really ?
    i love the last map i played
    That is what a good map looks like.

    I'm playing less and less of 7dtd since a17 hit, I like some of the changes, but others just really kill the game for me: encumbrance from inventory slots, move speed reduction from armor, the stam regen reduction from armor also sucks. These 3 issues are some of the major ones why I am losing interest in the game. Bascally I dispise moving slow in games, and it feels like its punishing me for using armor and my inventory in 7dtd.

    The game needs more blood and gore, if I shoot a zombie in the face with a shotgun I expect his head to explode if its a shot that would have killed it or something. I'll even take the a16 dismemberment system over a17 anyday. Sledgehammer should be literally smooshing heads as well.

    I also find it boring how everything is perk based now, I miss needing to find books to make things, it made exploration more exciting when you finally found that book you needed.
    Ive almost entirely retired playing this game as well,

    Speed and stam penalties are just too harsh, and I hate that you can craft everything , if high Int allowed you to read and learn from the more advanced books would have been a great way to merge these two things.

    Too much emphasis on realism is destroying the " Fun Factor"
    Last edited by OnlyMeiya; 02-11-2019 at 06:36 PM.

  2. #62
    Hunter
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    149
    Rep Power
    0
    Not ready for testers but is ready for publish. This reads like a brand new meme.

    TFP, please just admit pushing this was a mistake and we can all laugh at it.

  3. #63
    Reconstructionist
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Norway, land of trolls
    Posts
    690
    Rep Power
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Guppycur View Post
    Or paint the biome.
    How do i paint a happy little plain's biome?

    Or rather, how to paint and make it work. I tried paint.net, but appears it
    screw up when saving.

  4. #64
    Super Moderator Roland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    On a Zipline
    Posts
    14,434
    Rep Power
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Ranzera View Post
    Not ready for testers but is ready for publish. This reads like a brand new meme.

    TFP, please just admit pushing this was a mistake and we can all laugh at it.
    Since you don't seem to understand let me spell it out.

    When the game is "published" it will no longer be in "early access". 7 Days to Die 1.0 will be the published game. Nothing we have now is "published" and you are playing it at your own discretion.

    Waiting until publishing time is certainly an option and probably one you should carefully consider. Just admit that you erroneously thought the game was a finished product and you don't in your heart believe in the early access model and we can all laugh at it.

    <shrug>

    For the record, when the game really is published, if RWG is in this state I will be angry too. I just understand that it isn't that time yet and so there is no practical use to getting angry. Play it as is, or revert to an early version, or put it away and take a break.

    Have fun making your meme.

  5. #65
    Scavenger
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    48
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Kattla View Post
    How do i paint a happy little plain's biome?

    Or rather, how to paint and make it work. I tried paint.net, but appears it
    screw up when saving.
    I dont post much but wanted to share what I do. I generate a few worlds and look at the different biome and splat maps. Then I pick the best of the two, and copy the desired biome map into the folder of the world I want. Works well. Not sure how it works with water, I havent played 17.2E yet.

  6. #66
    Hunter
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    149
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Roland View Post
    Since you don't seem to understand let me spell it out.

    When the game is "published" it will no longer be in "early access". 7 Days to Die 1.0 will be the published game. Nothing we have now is "published" and you are playing it at your own discretion.

    Waiting until publishing time is certainly an option and probably one you should carefully consider. Just admit that you erroneously thought the game was a finished product and you don't in your heart believe in the early access model and we can all laugh at it.

    <shrug>

    For the record, when the game really is published, if RWG is in this state I will be angry too. I just understand that it isn't that time yet and so there is no practical use to getting angry. Play it as is, or revert to an early version, or put it away and take a break.

    Have fun making your meme.
    Since you don't seem to understand let me spell it out. TFP pushed an update with literally untested changes. Pushes to content delivery mechanisms is called publishing.

    >Don't you dare point out onee chan is being inflammatory and condescending on my forums!!! -- OzHawkeye<
    Last edited by Ranzera; 02-13-2019 at 07:52 AM.

  7. #67
    Leader Tin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    In between
    Posts
    5,549
    Rep Power
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Ranzera View Post
    Since you don't seem to understand let me spell it out. TFP pushed an update with literally untested changes. Pushes to content delivery mechanisms is called publishing.

    You don't need to wear butthurt all over your face every time you post btw. It makes you seem even less professional, if that's somehow possible.
    Since you don't seem to understand, they released an "experimental" that you had to manually opt-in to, and to treat it like it's a stable build is.. interesting.

  8. #68
    Community Moderator OzHawkeye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,310
    Rep Power
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Tin View Post
    Since you don't seem to understand, they released an "experimental" that you had to manually opt-in to, and to treat it like it's a stable build is.. interesting.
    Awww, beat me to it.

  9. #69
    Hunter
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    149
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tin View Post
    Since you don't seem to understand, they released an "experimental" that you had to manually opt-in to, and to treat it like it's a stable build is.. interesting.
    I understand that just fine. What you don't understand is that even experimental changes at least get a testing pass. You don't just throw builds at user acceptance testing. It creates anarchy in the dev process and loses the confidence of the users.

    You always have a QA step before you push.

  10. #70
    Community Moderator OzHawkeye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,310
    Rep Power
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Ranzera View Post
    I understand that just fine. What you don't understand is that even experimental changes at least get a testing pass. You don't just throw builds at user acceptance testing. It creates anarchy in the dev process and loses the confidence of the users.

    You always have a QA step before you push.
    And you don't suppose that the 17.2 experimental release was to allow for greater testing of things other than RWG? I mean, clearly RWG is borked right now, zero argument there, and as someone who plays exclusively RWG, I'm still playing A16 till it all gets sorted. But an experimental release may well include components that are borked, where the goal is to stress test other systems in the meantime while the borked one gets further love.

  11. #71
    Leader Tin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    In between
    Posts
    5,549
    Rep Power
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Ranzera View Post
    I understand that just fine. What you don't understand is that even experimental changes at least get a testing pass. You don't just throw builds at user acceptance testing. It creates anarchy in the dev process and kisses the confidence of the users.

    You always have a QA step before you push.
    Not always. Sometimes things get pushed and only have minimal testing done on it, which experimental/bleedingedge is the best place for it to go. It only upsets the confidence of those looking for a reason to be upset for whatever reason <shrug>
    Play stable, if it's starting to get to you. There's nothing wrong with opting out and waiting till the next build, be it experimental or stable.

  12. #72
    Hunter
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    149
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by OzHawkeye View Post
    And you don't suppose that the 17.2 experimental release was to allow for greater testing of things other than RWG? I mean, clearly RWG is borked right now, zero argument there, and as someone who plays exclusively RWG, I'm still playing A16 till it all gets sorted. But an experimental release may well include components that are borked, where the goal is to stress test other systems in the meantime while the borked one gets further love.
    The RWG changes did not need to be included. If they are even slightly competent, those changes would be in their own branch and it could be excluded from the main branch when it comes time to build/test/deploy.

  13. #73
    Hunter
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    149
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tin View Post
    Not always. Sometimes things get pushed and only have minimal testing done on it, which experimental/bleedingedge is the best place for it to go. It only upsets the confidence of those looking for a reason to be upset for whatever reason <shrug>
    Play stable, if it's starting to get to you. There's nothing wrong with opting out and waiting till the next build, be it experimental or stable.
    I'm not mad. I'm laughing my ass off at this dumpster fire. I thought we were all laughing about it until Roland got defensive and then I realized this was even funnier.

  14. #74
    Leader Tin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    In between
    Posts
    5,549
    Rep Power
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Ranzera View Post
    I'm not mad. I'm laughing my ass off at this dumpster fire. I thought we were all laughing about it until Roland got defensive and then I realized this was even funnier.
    It's alright, I didn't say you were mad. I just suggested you might consider opting out of the experimental build.
    You just keep implying there's something wrong, that experimental things, got released in a experimental build.
    All I'm doing is pointing out, there's nothing wrong with it.

  15. #75
    Hunter
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    149
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tin View Post
    It's alright, I didn't say you were mad. I just suggested you might consider opting out of the experimental build.
    You just keep implying there's something wrong, that experimental things, got released in a experimental build.
    All I'm doing is pointing out, there's nothing wrong with it.
    Well yeah there is. It's fine if it had bugs. But this wouldn't make it last QA and the conversation above clarified it never went to QA but it did get published. This is literally the "If it builds, ship it" meme in action. Not only that, is getting defended.

    This is the best thing that's happened all alpha!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •